
Quick answer
Alternative credit data is information not normally found in a credit report, such as rent, utility and phone bills or bank-account cash flow. Lenders use it to assess people with thin or no credit files, but US regulators say it must still meet fair lending and credit reporting laws[5].
Key points
- Traditional credit scores need a credit history; people without one are 'credit invisible' or have a 'thin file'.
- A Federal Reserve publication estimates roughly 32 million US adults cannot be scored: 7 million with no history and 25 million with thin files.
- Common alternative data includes rent, utilities, phone bills and cash-flow data from bank accounts.
- Five US agencies said in 2019 that alternative data can expand access to credit but must comply with fair lending, FCRA and UDAAP rules.
- Risks include errors that are hard to correct, privacy concerns and hidden bias.
On this page
#Why do some people have no credit score?
A credit score is calculated from your credit report. If you have never had a credit card or a loan, there is nothing to calculate. In 2015 the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) estimated that 26 million American adults were credit invisible, meaning they had no credit record at the nationwide credit bureaus, and another 19 million were unscorable because their records were too thin or too old[1]. Those estimates were later revised. A Federal Reserve publication from October 2025, citing a CFPB technical correction of June 2025, puts the number of 'unscoreable' adults at roughly 32 million: 7 million credit invisible (2.7% of adults) and 25 million with a thin file (9.8%)[2].
This is a catch-22. You need credit to build a credit history, and you need a credit history to get credit. Young adults, new arrivals to a country and people who have always paid in cash are often stuck here, even if they pay every bill on time. Alternative credit data is one attempt to break the loop.
#What counts as alternative credit data?
The Federal Reserve describes alternative data as information from non-traditional sources that could bolster or sometimes substitute for traditional credit data, with benefits and risks for consumers[2]. When the CFPB asked the public about it in 2017, the examples it listed included mobile phone bills, rent payments, utilities and electronic transactions such as deposits, withdrawals and transfers[4].
| Data type | Example | What it can tell a lender |
|---|---|---|
| Rent payments | Monthly rent paid from a bank account | Whether you pay a large recurring bill on time |
| Utility and phone bills | Electricity, water, mobile contract | A steady record of small regular payments[4] |
| Bank cash-flow data | Income in, spending out, overdrafts | How much money is left each month and how stable it is[5] |
| Platform data | Sales history of an online seller | How a small business is trading, used by some big tech lenders[6] |
Some sources (rent, bills) behave like traditional payment records; others (cash flow, platform data) are newer and raise more questions about consent and accuracy.
#How do lenders get and use alternative data?
There are two main routes. In the first, the data is reported to a credit bureau and becomes part of your file, so ordinary scores can see it. In the second, you give a lender permission to read your bank account data directly, often through open banking connections, and the lender analyses your cash flow: money coming in, money going out and what is left. In December 2019 five US agencies, including the Federal Reserve and the CFPB, said that alternative data such as cash-flow data may expand access to credit and help some borrowers obtain more favourable pricing[5].
Cash-flow underwriting, simplified
- You consent — share account data
- Data connection — bank or open banking API
- Lender model — income, bills, surplus
- Decision — approve, price or decline
A real example comes from the US mortgage market. In August 2021 Fannie Mae announced that from 18 September 2021 its Desktop Underwriter system would, with the applicant's permission, automatically identify recurring rent payments in bank statement data[3]. Fannie Mae said fewer than 5% of renters had their rent payments reported on their credit bureau report, and that in a sample of applicants who had not owned a home in the past three years and did not receive a favourable recommendation, 17% could have received one if their rent history had been considered[3].
Worked example
Worked example: a simple cash-flow view
A hypothetical applicant with no credit history shares six months of bank data. A lender might summarise it like this (figures computed with code; real models use many more signals).
- Average monthly money in (6 months)
- $3,200
- Average monthly money out (6 months)
- $2,750
- Monthly surplus each month
- $500, $350, $650, $300, $500, $400
- Average monthly surplus
- $450
- Rent of $1,100 as a share of average money in
- about 34%
#Can machine learning on new data predict defaults better?
Sometimes, in some conditions. A Bank for International Settlements (BIS) working paper studied a Chinese fintech lender's data from 2017 and found that a model using machine learning and non-traditional data predicted losses and defaults better than traditional models when credit conditions suddenly worsened[6]. The same paper found that the advantage shrank for borrowers with a longer credit history[6]. In other words, new data helps most where old data is missing, which is exactly the thin-file problem.
#What are the risks of alternative credit data?
When the CFPB opened its 2017 inquiry, it flagged several risks: data that is inconsistent, incomplete or wrong; privacy concerns about how it is collected and used; the chance that some data acts as a stand-in for race, ethnicity or gender and leads to discrimination; and the difficulty consumers may have in understanding decisions or correcting errors in non-traditional data[4]. The 2019 interagency statement makes the same point from the lender's side: firms must check how fair lending law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and rules against unfair, deceptive or abusive practices (UDAAP) apply before using new data[5].
One protection does not change when the data is new. Under US Regulation B, a lender that declines you must give specific principal reasons, not just say you failed to reach a qualifying score[7]. If a decision used alternative data, those reasons should still point to the factors that mattered.
Common beginner mistakes about alternative data
Assuming rent always counts
Rent only helps if it is reported to a bureau or the lender reads it from your bank data with your permission.
Thinking alternative data only helps
Missed bills or frequent overdrafts in your account data can count against you too.
Sharing access without checking the scope
Some connections read months of transactions; give access only for the purpose you intend.
Ignoring the right to reasons
If you are declined in the US, you are entitled to specific reasons that you can act on.
#How does alternative data connect to BNPL and embedded lending?
Many newer lenders, including buy now, pay later providers and the platforms behind embedded finance, make quick decisions with their own data rather than a full credit report. The BIS has noted that big tech lenders such as Mercado Libre and Ant Financial say they use more than 1,000 data series per loan applicant[8]. That can widen access, but it also means your borrowing may not show up where other lenders look, which is a growing concern for credit reporting systems.
The bottom line
Alternative credit data fills gaps for people the traditional system cannot see, using records such as rent, bills and bank cash flow. It can widen access, but it comes with real questions about accuracy, privacy and fairness, and the same consumer protection laws still apply. Share data deliberately and know your right to an explanation if you are declined.
Frequently asked questions
Will paying rent on time improve my credit score?
Only if it is reported to a credit bureau or a lender reads it with your permission. Fannie Mae found fewer than 5% of renters had rent on their bureau report in 2021[3].
Is alternative data legal to use?
In the US, yes, but lenders must comply with fair lending law, the FCRA and UDAAP rules, according to the 2019 interagency statement[5].
What does 'credit invisible' mean?
Having no credit record at the nationwide credit bureaus. A 2025 Federal Reserve estimate puts this at 7 million US adults[2].
Can alternative data hurt me?
Yes. It can contain errors that are harder to correct, raise privacy issues and may show negative patterns such as overdrafts[4].
Sources
- CFPB Report Finds 26 Million Consumers Are Credit Invisible — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2015 Primary
- Consumer & Community Context — October 2025 (Alternative data: expanding access to credit) — Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2025 Primary
- Fannie Mae Introduces New Underwriting Innovation to Help More Renters Become Homeowners — Fannie Mae, 2021 Primary
- CFPB Explores Impact of Alternative Data on Credit Access for Consumers Who Are Credit Invisible — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2017 Primary
- Interagency Statement on the Use of Alternative Data in Credit Underwriting (CA 19-11) — Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2019 Primary
- How do machine learning and non-traditional data affect credit scoring? New evidence from a Chinese fintech firm (Working Paper 834) — Bank for International Settlements, 2019 Primary
- 12 CFR 1002.9 — Notifications (Regulation B) — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Primary
- Annual Economic Report 2019, Chapter III: Big tech in finance — opportunities and risks — Bank for International Settlements, 2019 Primary



